U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading forum for severe conversation of American foreign policy and international affairs. The magazine has actually featured contributions from numerous prominent global affairs experts.
More Resources
- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI
ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.
- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI
How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage
Anne Neuberger
-.
Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai.
Copy
Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.
Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the minute.
MLA Cite not available at the moment.
APSA Cite not available at the moment.
APA Cite not available at the moment
Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.
Request Reprint.
Request reprint consents here.
In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a critical intelligence obstacle in its burgeoning competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from World War II might no longer offer adequate intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an audacious moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering vital intelligence, recording images of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.
Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is heightening, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must benefit from its world-class economic sector and adequate capability for innovation to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood must harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The combination of artificial intelligence, especially through big language models, provides groundbreaking opportunities to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, making it possible for the shipment of faster and more pertinent assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation comes with substantial drawbacks, nevertheless, especially as adversaries make use of comparable advancements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to secure itself from opponents who might use the innovation for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.
For the U.S. nationwide security neighborhood, fulfilling the guarantee and managing the hazard of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a desire to alter the method companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while mitigating its intrinsic risks, ensuring that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a quickly progressing global landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation intends to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.
MORE, BETTER, FASTER
AI's capacity to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood depends on its ability to procedure and evaluate huge quantities of information at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate large amounts of gathered information to generate time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services could leverage AI systems' pattern recognition capabilities to determine and alert human analysts to possible dangers, hikvisiondb.webcam such as missile launches or military motions, or essential worldwide developments that analysts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This capability would guarantee that vital cautions are prompt, actionable, and pertinent, enabling more effective reactions to both rapidly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence could supply a detailed view of military movements, making it possible for quicker and more accurate risk evaluations and possibly new ways of delivering details to policymakers.
Intelligence experts can likewise unload recurring and time-consuming jobs to machines to concentrate on the most satisfying work: creating initial and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's overall insights and performance. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has paid off. The capabilities of language designs have actually grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 models showed significant progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be utilized to a lot more rapidly equate and sum up text, audio, and video files.
Although difficulties remain, future systems trained on greater quantities of non-English data could be efficient in discerning subtle distinctions between dialects and comprehending the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood might focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be difficult to discover, typically battle to get through the clearance procedure, and take a long time to train. And obviously, by making more foreign language products available across the ideal agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to select out the needles in the haystack that really matter.
The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can swiftly sort through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then verify and refine, making sure the final products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts could team up with an innovative AI assistant to work through analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, improving each model of their analyses and delivering completed intelligence quicker.
Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of documents and an additional 55,000 files kept on CDs, including pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned immense pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to develop an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts a number of months-and numerous hours of labor-to equate each page, evaluate it by hand for pertinent content, and integrate that details into evaluations. With today's AI abilities, the very first 2 actions in that process might have been accomplished within days, possibly even hours, permitting analysts to understand and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.
Among the most interesting applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, enabling them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would allow users to ask specific questions and receive summarized, appropriate details from countless reports with source citations, helping them make notified decisions rapidly.
BRAVE NEW WORLD
Although AI provides various benefits, it likewise poses significant brand-new threats, especially as foes establish similar innovations. China's developments in AI, especially in computer system vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian program, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale information collection practices that have yielded data sets of tremendous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on huge amounts of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for different purposes, such as monitoring and social control. The existence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software all over the world could offer China with ready access to bulk information, significantly bulk images that can be used to train facial recognition designs, a specific concern in countries with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security community need to think about how Chinese designs built on such substantial data sets can provide China a tactical advantage.
And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those created by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting effective AI abilities into the hands of users throughout the globe at fairly budget friendly costs. A number of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian routines, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are utilizing large language models to quickly generate and spread incorrect and destructive content or to carry out cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals obstruct capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share a few of their AI breakthroughs with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, consequently increasing the risk to the United States and its allies.
The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI models will end up being attractive targets for foes. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being important national assets that must be safeguarded against foes looking for to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence neighborhood must buy establishing safe and secure AI models and in establishing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous assessment to secure against possible risks. These teams can utilize AI to mimic attacks, uncovering possible weak points and establishing techniques to mitigate them. Proactive steps, including collaboration with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be essential.
THE NEW NORMAL
These obstacles can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI innovations to totally mature carries its own threats; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in establishing AI. To guarantee that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be an advantage for the United States and its allies, the nation's intelligence neighborhood requires to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services must rapidly master the usage of AI technologies and make AI a foundational component in their work. This is the only sure way to ensure that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their adversaries, and secure the United States' delicate abilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will require a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence experts mainly construct items from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI models for voice and images analysis. Moving forward, intelligence authorities ought to check out including a hybrid technique, in line with existing laws, utilizing AI designs trained on unclassified commercially available information and fine-tuned with classified details. This amalgam of innovation and standard intelligence gathering could lead to an AI entity providing direction to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an incorporated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automated voice translation.
To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders must champion the advantages of AI combination, highlighting the enhanced abilities and effectiveness it provides. The cadre of newly appointed chief AI officers has been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to function as leads within their companies for promoting AI innovation and eliminating barriers to the technology's implementation. Pilot projects and early wins can build momentum and confidence in AI's capabilities, motivating broader adoption. These officers can take advantage of the proficiency of nationwide laboratories and other partners to evaluate and refine AI models, ensuring their efficiency and security. To institutionalize change, leaders should create other organizational incentives, including promos and training chances, to reward inventive approaches and those employees and units that show efficient use of AI.
The White House has produced the policy needed for using AI in national security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order concerning safe, safe, and trustworthy AI detailed the assistance needed to fairly and safely use the innovation, and National Security Memorandum 25, released in October 2024, is the country's fundamental technique for utilizing the power and handling the dangers of AI to advance national security. Now, Congress will require to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and firms to create the facilities required for development and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and assessments, and continue to purchase assessment capabilities to ensure that the United States is building trustworthy and high-performing AI innovations.
Intelligence and military communities are dedicated to keeping humans at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have produced the frameworks and tools to do so. Agencies will need guidelines for how their analysts need to use AI designs to make certain that intelligence products meet the intelligence community's standards for reliability. The federal government will also require to maintain clear assistance for managing the information of U.S. citizens when it pertains to the training and usage of big language models. It will be very important to stabilize using emerging innovations with protecting the personal privacy and civil liberties of citizens. This indicates enhancing oversight systems, updating relevant frameworks to reflect the capabilities and threats of AI, and cultivating a culture of AI development within the national security device that utilizes the capacity of the innovation while protecting the rights and flexibilities that are foundational to American society.
Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite images by establishing much of the essential innovations itself, winning the AI race will need that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with personal industry. The economic sector, which is the main ways through which the federal government can understand AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, data centers, and calculating power. Given those companies' improvements, intelligence companies need to focus on leveraging commercially available AI models and refining them with categorized data. This technique enables the intelligence community to rapidly broaden its capabilities without needing to go back to square one, enabling it to remain competitive with enemies. A current collaboration between NASA and IBM to produce the world's largest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI community as an open-source project-is an excellent presentation of how this type of public-private collaboration can operate in practice.
As the national security community incorporates AI into its work, it should guarantee the security and durability of its models. Establishing requirements to deploy generative AI safely is vital for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's brand-new AI Security Center and its partnership with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.
As the United States deals with growing rivalry to shape the future of the worldwide order, it is immediate that its intelligence firms and military capitalize on the country's development and leadership in AI, focusing especially on large language models, to provide faster and more relevant details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight required to navigate a more complex, competitive, and content-rich world.
