Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With up to date news and a little however lively 14 Billion specification model, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to respond to humankind's toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, just as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less simple to pin down. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months back so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, elearnportal.science summarization, freechat.mytakeonit.org and ranking. With each question we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We postured the following questions to our AI and evaluated its response. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the essential points from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her pals and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly offered comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not addressing the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial occasion, the odds and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm attempting to determine the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The short article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is pretty high. ... I also require to think of the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are conscious of the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 seems like a considerable number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, confidence in the strategy, and the likelihood that they'll utilize it numerous times, specifically if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That seems substantial since it shows he's done it in the past, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent posts, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could mean he's less most likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel fit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about including any controversial songs in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime show, so there's a danger that such material may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold carry on big stages. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which might give him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to trigger offense which he actually discovered it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in eating, especially with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the situation is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and believes anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historic information that might influence this forecast.

First, I read through the articles offered. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a big difference.

However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally considered random. The slight historical edge for tails could be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should think about whether this historical bias must influence the likelihood.

After considering it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a minor preference for tails, it's not statistically considerable adequate to move the possibility away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists but does not bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely think the exact same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ current games, specifically the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and fakenews.win the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "outrageous." They say there's no evidence of systematic bias. That's a strong declaration from the individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might indicate there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some fact to it.

Taking a look at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been punished more considering that 2022. That's fascinating since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't dismiss every possibility, but incredibly not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game turns out before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.