Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the typical law, and is codified in numerous state, federal, and local laws. These laws restrict discrimination based on particular characteristics or "protected classifications". The United States Constitution also restricts discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the private sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has actually ended up being subject to a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a number of locations, including recruiting, employing, job evaluations, promotion policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend defense to extra classifications or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers typically can not discriminate against staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] nationwide origin, [1] impairment (physical or mental, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] insolvency or bad financial obligations, [9] genetic details, [10] and citizenship status (for citizens, permanent locals, short-lived locals, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964


Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight address employment discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to protect federal government workers.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny individuals of "life, liberty, or home", without due process of the law. It also consists of an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly prohibits states from violating an individual's rights of due procedure and equal defense. In the work context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by dealing with workers, former employees, or job candidates unequally because of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure protection requires that federal government staff members have a fair procedural process before they are ended if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to complimentary speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination expenses (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional since Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly provide their particular federal government the power to enact civil rights laws that apply to the personal sector. The Federal federal government's authority to regulate a private service, consisting of civil liberties laws, originates from their power to regulate all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically afford some defense from public and private work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just address prejudiced treatment by the government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that manage the economic sector are normally Constitutional under the "cops powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws designed to secure public health, security and morals. All States must comply with the Federal Civil Rights laws, but States might enact civil liberties laws that use extra employment protection.

For example, some State civil rights laws offer defense from employment discrimination on the basis of political association, even though such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has developed in time.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act forbids employers and unions from paying different wages based on sex. It does not restrict other discriminatory practices in working with. It offers that where workers carry out equal operate in the corner needing "equal skill, effort, and duty and carried out under comparable working conditions," they need to be offered equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to companies engaged in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a significant quantity of interstate commerce. [citation needed]

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in much more elements of the employment relationship. "Title VII developed the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to a lot of employers taken part in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor organizations, and employment service. Title VII prohibits discrimination based upon race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it prohibited for companies to discriminate based upon secured qualities relating to terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. Employment service might not discriminate when employing or referring candidates, and labor organizations are also forbidden from basing subscription or union categories on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act modified Title VII in 1978, defining that unlawful sex discrimination includes discrimination based upon pregnancy, employment giving birth, and associated medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, faith, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and modified in 1978 and 1986, prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost similar to those outlined in Title VII, other than that the ADEA protects employees in companies with 20 or more workers instead of 15 or more. A staff member is protected from discrimination based upon age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and restricted obligatory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise offer large pensions). The ADEA consists of explicit guidelines for benefit, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of many conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy against age discrimination among federal specialists". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal professionals with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal financial assistance. [16] It needs affirmative action as well as non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 requires affordable lodging, and Section 508 needs that electronic and info innovation be available to disabled workers. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 prohibits discrimination by mine operators against miners who struggle with "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam period veterans by federal professionals". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than 3 staff members from victimizing anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to get rid of inequitable barriers against certified people with impairments, people with a record of a disability, or people who are concerned as having a special needs. It forbids discrimination based on genuine or viewed physical or mental disabilities. It likewise requires companies to provide sensible accommodations to staff members who require them due to the fact that of a disability to get a task, carry out the essential functions of a task, or delight in the benefits and privileges of employment, unless the company can show that unnecessary hardship will result. There are rigorous constraints on when an employer can ask disability-related questions or need medical evaluations, and all medical info should be treated as personal. An impairment is specified under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "significantly restricts several significant life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, changed in 1993, ensure all persons equal rights under the law and outline the damages offered to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing people' genetic info when making hiring, shooting, task placement, or promo choices. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not explicitly include sexual orientation and 29 US states do not explicitly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's restriction of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; numerous states and localities explicitly forbid harassment and predisposition in employment choices on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT workers; the EEOC's identified that transgender workers were protected under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to incorporate sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies show that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have actually experienced some type of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender employees report some form of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Many individuals in the LGBT community have actually lost their job, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who claims that her manager told her that her presence might make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]

Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private work environments. A few more states ban LGBT discrimination in just public work environments. [27] Some opponents of these laws think that it would intrude on religious liberty, despite the fact that these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually likewise identified that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes also provide substantial protection from work discrimination. Some laws extend similar protection as provided by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws supply higher security to staff members of the state or of state professionals.

The following table lists categories not secured by federal law. Age is consisted of as well, because federal law just covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - enlisting, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]

Government staff members

Title VII also applies to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra protections versus work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 restricts discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not impact job performance. The Office of Personnel Management has actually translated this as restricting discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the analysis would be expanded to consist of gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public employees retain their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies can limits employees' speech in particular methods. [93] Public workers maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]

Federal workers who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) must sue in the correct federal jurisdiction, which postures a different set of concerns for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are normally allowed to consider qualities that would otherwise be inequitable if they are authentic occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that law enforcement security can match races when required. For instance, if cops are running operations that include confidential informants, or undercover agents, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and employ officers that are proportionate to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not use in the entertainment market, such as casting for movies and tv. [95] Directors, producers and casting staff are allowed to cast characters based on physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are rare in the home entertainment industry, specifically in performers. [95] This validation is special to the entertainment industry, and does not transfer to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, employers will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage spaces in between different groups of workers. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company must balance personal privacy and security worry about the variety of positions that an employer are trying to fill. [96]

Additionally, customer preference alone can not be a validation unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For instance, retail establishments in backwoods can not forbid African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the client base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that handle children survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If an employer were attempting to prove that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there must be an accurate basis for thinking that all or substantially all members of a class would be not able to perform the job safely and effectively or that it is impractical to determine credentials on an individualized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a sinister intention does not transform a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory result. [97] Employers likewise bring the problem to show that a BFOQ is fairly essential, and a lesser prejudiced alternative technique does not exist. [98]

Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is dealing with individuals differently in their employment because of their religious beliefs, their faiths and practices, and/or their request for lodging (a modification in a workplace guideline or policy) of their faiths and practices. It also consists of dealing with people differently in their work since of their absence of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, companies are restricted from declining to employ an individual based on their faith- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If an employee believes that they have actually experienced spiritual discrimination, they need to address this to the alleged offender. On the other hand, staff members are protected by the law for reporting job discrimination and are able to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have stipulations that ban discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States offer particular exemptions in these laws to services or institutions that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in different areas, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been supported and others reversed gradually.

The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are utilizing religious beliefs versus changing the body and preventative medicine as a justification to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not allow workers to request religious exemptions, or reject their application may be charged by the staff member with employment discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs. However, there are particular requirements for workers to present proof that it is a seriously held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 explicitly permits discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has actually dealt with criticism for restricting females from serving in fight roles. In 2016, however, the law was modified to enable them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article posted on the PBS site, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the method in which black men were treated in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites gave the African Americans a possibility to prove themselves as Americans by having them get involved in the war. The National Geographic website states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were just enabled to work as servants; their participation was restricted to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans desired to defend the nation they resided in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the task rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to undertake military service or specific types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise forbids employers from discriminating against workers for past or present involvement or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that provide choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to impose systemic diverse treatment of females because there is a vast underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has rejected this claim due to the fact that there was no inequitable intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly victimize a secured classification may still be unlawful if they produce a disparate effect on members of a secured group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids employment practices that have a prejudiced effect, unless they belong to task efficiency.

The Act requires the removal of synthetic, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to work that operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be associated with task efficiency, it is restricted, regardless of the employer's lack of discriminatory intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have actually been identified by the EEOC as having a diverse effect on national origin minorities. [108]

When resisting a disparate impact claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not need to show need; rather, it must simply show that its practice is sensible. [citation required]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and imposes the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are contained in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and guidelines are consisted of in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to file fit under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative solutions by filing an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to filing their lawsuit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against qualified people with specials needs by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and imposes its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get monetary support. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which forbids discrimination based upon citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

See also

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT work discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination against individuals with rap sheets in the United States
Racial wage gap in the United States
Gender pay gap in the United States
Criticism of credit history systems in the United States


References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans office bias against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful prejudiced practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [permanent dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment since of age of employee or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [irreversible dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their employing practices based on a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US women in battle". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Job Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Leading to the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to secure older workers. Weak to begin with, she mentions that the ADEA has been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.