Employment discrimination law in the United States derives from the typical law, and is codified in numerous state, federal, and local laws. These laws restrict discrimination based on particular attributes or "safeguarded classifications". The United States Constitution also forbids discrimination by federal and state governments against their public workers. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has become subject to a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a number of areas, consisting of recruiting, hiring, task evaluations, promo policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws often extend defense to additional classifications or employers.

Under federal work discrimination law, employers normally can not victimize staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] national origin, [1] special needs (physical or mental, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] insolvency or bad financial obligations, [9] genetic details, [10] and citizenship status (for citizens, permanent citizens, short-lived homeowners, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964


Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight resolve employment discrimination, however its restrictions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to safeguard federal government employees.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny individuals of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due procedure of the law. It also includes an implicit guarantee that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly restricts states from breaking an individual's rights of due process and equivalent security. In the work context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by dealing with staff members, previous employees, or job applicants unequally since of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process protection needs that civil servant have a fair procedural process before they are terminated if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically offer their particular government the power to enact civil rights laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to control a personal business, including civil rights laws, originates from their power to regulate all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly manage some security from public and private employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just resolve inequitable treatment by the federal government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that control the economic sector are typically Constitutional under the "cops powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws designed to safeguard public health, security and morals. All States need to comply with the Federal Civil Rights laws, but States might enact civil rights laws that use additional work defense.

For instance, some State civil rights laws use protection from work discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, even though such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil rights laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has actually established gradually.

The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers and unions from paying different wages based on sex. It does not prohibit other discriminatory practices in employing. It provides that where workers perform equal work in the corner needing "equal skill, effort, and responsibility and carried out under similar working conditions," they must be provided equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers participated in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of a company's employees if the business is engaged as a whole in a significant amount of interstate commerce. [citation needed]

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in a lot more aspects of the work relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to a lot of employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 employees, labor companies, and employment agencies. Title VII forbids discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It makes it prohibited for employers to discriminate based upon secured characteristics relating to terms, conditions, and opportunities of work. Employment firms may not discriminate when hiring or referring applicants, and labor companies are likewise forbidden from basing membership or union categories on race, color, faith, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, giving birth, and associated medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "prohibits discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, restricts employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The forbidden practices are nearly identical to those described in Title VII, other than that the ADEA safeguards employees in companies with 20 or more workers instead of 15 or more. An employee is protected from discrimination based on age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and forbade mandatory retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that also supply big pensions). The ADEA contains specific guidelines for benefit, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of the majority of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy versus age discrimination among federal contractors". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts work discrimination on the basis of special needs by the federal government, federal specialists with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal monetary support. [16] It needs affirmative action in addition to non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs affordable accommodation, and Section 508 requires that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled workers. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators against miners who struggle with "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam period veterans by federal professionals". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids work discrimination on the basis of insolvency or bad debts. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids companies with more than 3 employees from discriminating versus anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove inequitable barriers versus qualified people with disabilities, individuals with a record of an impairment, or people who are considered having an impairment. It prohibits discrimination based upon genuine or viewed physical or psychological disabilities. It also needs companies to provide sensible accommodations to staff members who need them since of a special needs to look for a job, carry out the vital functions of a task, or enjoy the benefits and privileges of employment, unless the employer can show that unnecessary hardship will result. There are rigorous restrictions on when a company can ask disability-related concerns or require medical examinations, and all medical info needs to be dealt with as private. An impairment is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "significantly limits several significant life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, changed in 1993, guarantee all individuals equivalent rights under the law and employment detail the damages offered to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from using people' genetic info when making hiring, firing, job positioning, or promotion choices. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not explicitly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not explicitly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment defenses for LGBT individuals were patchwork; several states and localities explicitly prohibit harassment and predisposition in work choices on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's determined that transgender workers were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the security to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have actually experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the work environment. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender workers report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Many individuals in the LGBT community have lost their task, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who declares that her manager told her that her presence might make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]

Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and personal offices. A couple of more states prohibit LGBT discrimination in just public offices. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, although these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually also identified that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or religious liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes likewise provide comprehensive defense from employment discrimination. Some laws extend similar protection as supplied by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws provide greater protection to workers of the state or of state contractors.

The following table lists categories not protected by federal law. Age is consisted of also, considering that federal law only covers workers over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - admission, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]

Civil servant

Title VII also applies to state, federal, local and other public workers. Employees of federal and state governments have extra securities versus work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 restricts discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not affect task performance. The Office of Personnel Management has actually interpreted this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the interpretation would be broadened to include gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public staff members keep their First Amendment rights, whereas private employers can limitations workers' speech in certain ways. [93] Public staff members keep their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a personal citizen (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]

Federal employees who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should sue in the proper federal jurisdiction, which postures a various set of issues for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational certifications

Employers are usually allowed to think about attributes that would otherwise be prejudiced if they are bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the second most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that law enforcement monitoring can match races when required. For example, if police are running operations that involve confidential informants, or undercover representatives, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, police departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are in proportion to the community's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not use in the home entertainment industry, such as casting for movies and tv. [95] Directors, producers and casting personnel are enabled to cast characters based on physical attributes, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are rare in the entertainment market, specifically in performers. [95] This validation is unique to the home entertainment market, and does not move to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage gaps in between different groups of workers. [96] Cost can be considered when a company needs to balance privacy and safety worry about the variety of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]

Additionally, customer preference alone can not be a reason unless there is a privacy or security defense. [96] For circumstances, retail establishments in rural locations can not prohibit African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that deal with kids survivors of sexual abuse is allowed.

If a company were trying to show that employment discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there must be a factual basis for believing that all or substantially all members of a class would be not able to carry out the task safely and efficiently or that it is unwise to figure out qualifications on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a sinister intention does not transform a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory result. [97] Employers also carry the concern to show that a BFOQ is reasonably needed, and a lower prejudiced option technique does not exist. [98]

Religious employment discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people differently in their employment because of their religious beliefs, their spiritual beliefs and practices, and/or their ask for accommodation (a modification in a work environment rule or policy) of their religions and practices. It also consists of dealing with individuals in a different way in their employment due to the fact that of their absence of spiritual belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employers are restricted from refusing to hire an individual based upon their religion- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If a staff member believes that they have experienced religious discrimination, they need to address this to the alleged wrongdoer. On the other hand, employees are protected by the law for reporting task discrimination and have the ability to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have clauses that ban discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States give certain exemptions in these laws to organizations or institutions that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to varying degrees in various areas, depending upon the setting and the context; some of these have actually been maintained and others reversed over time.

The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the widespread rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are utilizing religions against changing the body and preventative medicine as a validation to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not permit staff members to use for religious exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the employee with employment discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are specific requirements for employees to present proof that it is a truly held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 explicitly allows discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has actually dealt with criticism for prohibiting women from serving in fight roles. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was amended to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the short article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the method which black men were treated in the military during the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites provided the African Americans an opportunity to show themselves as Americans by having them participate in the war. The National Geographic site states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were only allowed to work as servants; their participation was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans desired to protect the nation they resided in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the job rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to undertake military service or particular kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise restricts companies from victimizing employees for past or present involvement or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to enforce systemic disparate treatment of females due to the fact that there is a huge underrepresentation of females in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually rejected this claim due to the fact that there was no prejudiced intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly discriminate against a protected classification might still be unlawful if they produce a diverse impact on members of a secured group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have an inequitable impact, unless they are associated to job efficiency.

The Act needs the elimination of synthetic, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be related to task performance, it is prohibited, regardless of the employer's absence of prejudiced intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have been recognized by the EEOC as having a diverse influence on national origin minorities. [108]

When resisting a disparate effect claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to demonstrate necessity; rather, it should just show that its practice is sensible. [citation needed]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translates and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are included in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its regulations and guidelines are contained in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to file match under Title VII and/or the ADA must exhaust their administrative solutions by submitting an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to filing their lawsuit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination versus certified individuals with disabilities by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each firm has and imposes its own policies that apply to its own programs and to any entities that receive financial support. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based on citizenship status or national origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) offices play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT employment discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination versus individuals with rap sheets in the United States
Racial wage space in the United States
Gender pay space in the United States
Criticism of credit scoring systems in the United States


References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in employment". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits work environment predisposition against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Preference Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Tabulation, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful discriminatory practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in certain activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Chief Law Officer|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment due to the fact that of age of employee or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [permanent dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their working with practices based upon an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Get ready for more US females in combat". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Leading to the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the original on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to safeguard older employees. Weak to start with, she mentions that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.